Here is the Text of the best speech at the UN General Assembly this year, given by a REAL leader, Benjamin Netanyahu. I wish it would have been given by our President, instead of the cold, un-American, uninspiring, shameful drivel of a speech he gave.
It seems as though we (Americans) have the ideological love child of Neville Chamberlain and Jimmy Carter's leading us (using the world "leading" loosely), and Israel has ideological love-child of Winston Churchill and Ronald Reagan leading them. Since liberals are sooooo much "smarter" than us dumb hicks that call ourselves conservatives (I know this because Bill Maher and all the other lefties keep telling me so)..perhaps they can read some history books and tell me, which set of the afore mentioned leaders yielded more long term peace? Which set was victorious in the face of evil? Which set was in line with George Washington at the first annual address to congress on January 8th 1790 when he said: "To be prepared for war is the most effectual means of preserving peace?" And which set of "leaders" weakened their respective countries, encouraging their adversaries who like every good bully, smelled their cowardice and weakness a mile away, and exercised every opportunity to advance their self-appointed power, leaving the life and liberties of countless innocent people under the sole of their despotic shoes? Better to ask it this way...which of the afore mentioned leaders had to clean up the mess that the the other set left behind? Tyrants speak one language, the language of strength and weakness...they do not honor their promises, their treaties might as well be written on toilet paper, and they make fools out of those who put their trust in them. They look at America (& her allies), assess the strength of her leaders (or lack their of), and act accordingly. If they see weakness, they seize upon it; if they see strength and they stay in their play pins. Must we really go through the pain and suffering of learning this lesson again?
No comments:
Post a Comment